Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)
The ABCMR, established under 10 U.S.C. 1552, is the highest level of administrative review within the Department of the Army. The mission of the ABCMR is to correct errors and remove injustices from Army records.
Such records include, but are not limited to, records regarding discharges, reenlistment codes, disciplinary matters, performance evaluations, selection for promotion, advancement, retirement, dates of service, disability ratings, medals, and various bonuses and benefits.
Who is eligible to apply?
Current and former members of the United States Army (including Reserve personnel) may apply for a correction of an error or removal of an injustice in their official military record. If a former service member is deceased or incompetent, the member’s spouse, widow or widower, next of kin (parent, sibling, or child), or legal representative can apply for the service member. Applicants must first exhaust available administrative avenues of relief before applying to the ABCMR.
How do you apply?
To apply, applicants must submit a completed DD149 form containing the veteran’s personal information, requested correction, justification for the request, and date and time when the alleged error or injustice was discovered, among other information. Applicants may attach as evidence documents in support of their application.
The burden of proof to show either an error or injustice rests with the applicant. Absent evidence to the contrary, the ABCMR will presume that the military record was appropriate and in compliance with Army regulations. Applicants can request a personal appearance before the Board, but are not entitled to a hearing.
Is there any risk to applying?
No, the ABCMR cannot make anything worse in an applicant’s service record, only better.
How long does it take?
The ABCMR processes thousands of applications a year. As a result, an applicant should expect to wait as long as 18 months before the board considers their case.
What is liberal consideration?
On September 3, 2014, the Secretary of Defense issued a memorandum providing guidance to the ABCMR as it considers petitions brought by veterans claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) with other than honorable conditions discharge. This includes a comprehensive review of all materials and evidence provided by the applicant.
This policy was issued to make the application process easier for veterans seeking redress and assists the Board in reaching fair and consistent results in these cases. The guidance also mandates liberal waivers of time limits, ensures timely consideration of petitions, and allows for increased involvement of medical personnel in Board determinations.
Liberal consideration also applies to request by veterans for a discharge upgrade due to mental health conditions (including Traumatic Brain Injury), sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
What if I was discharged under Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell?
On September 20, 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense issued a policy addressing how service boards of correction should review applications to correction of records of individuals discharged under DADT or a similar policy in place prior to DADT. Boards were directed to normally grant requests to change narrative reasons of discharge, characterization of discharges, and re-entry codes of individuals provided the following two conditions are met:
- The original discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to the enactment of DADT; and
- There were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct.
The policy directs that an honorable or general discharge should be considered absent aggravating factors.
Contact us today
MJA has successfully represented veterans seeking a discharge upgrade and other relief at the Boards for Correction of Military Records. Our skilled attorneys can comb through your military record and build the strongest case possible for your discharge review. Call us today for a free consultation.
"Best Experience-Best Outcome-Best Service."
The relief we felt when we received that phone call from Joshua Hill was something I cannot even describe. If you want someone who will communicate with you and for you, fight for you, and extremely professional, hire Joshua Hill.- Lori
"Recommending, advising and informing!"
If you are looking for an attorney who will listen to your concerns and feel that he is personally and professionally invested in results, Joshua Hill is your attorney. I was astonished by the level of knowledge Mr. Hill possesses while proving he is strat- Kerri
"Experienced, responsive, and knowledgeable."
mmediately upon my retaining Mr. Healy he was there, accessible, through phone and text, explaining to me all the answers of the questions I had about the intimidating arena I had just been forced into. He replied to all of my concerns thoroughly and speci- Tyler
"Honest and Amazing Attorney."
I called Mr.Hill and talking with him, he was very respectful, professional and most of all honest. Whenever I had a question, Mr. Hill was very accurate and informative during the whole process.- Rodney
"An Excellent Lawyer!"
Gerald Healy represented my son in a very serious court martial case. He walked with us each step of the way from the beginning to the end. He put in numerous hours and left no stone overturned when working on my son’s case.- Anonymous
Camp Pendleton, CA. Marine charged with sexually assaulting a dependent spouse was found not guilty after MJA obtained DNA testing.
FULL ACQUITTAL FULL ACQUITTAL
Fort Stewart, GA. Army Staff Sergeant fully acquitted of larceny and solicitation to commit larceny of government property.
CHARGES DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE CHARGES DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
Fort Campbell, KY. Sexual assault charges dismissed with prejudice after MJA exposed government discovery violations.
FULL ACQUITTAL FULL ACQUITTAL
Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany. Senior Airman falsely accused of committing rape and sexual assault against a fellow service member. Not guilty verdict was returned with 30 minutes of deliberation.
FULL ACQUITTAL FULL ACQUITTAL
Kings Bay, GA. Navy Master-at-Arms found not guilty of allegedly unholstering firearm and pointing it at another Sailor.
CHARGES DISMISSED CHARGES DISMISSED
Fort Johnson, LA. Army Specialist charged with multiple sexual assaults released from confinement and had charges dismissed due to false allegations.