Skip to Content
Fighting For You, No Matter Where You're Stationed! 843-773-5501
Top

Blogs from October, 2025

  • Article 120a is a largely unknown article of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that criminalizes using the mail to send obscene materials. While we live in a digital age in which information is easily transmitted electronically, it is still a crime in the military to knowingly deposit or cause someone else to deposit in the mail certain inappropriate material. The consequences for doing so can be serious and life-changing.

    When your military career, future, and freedom are on the line, you need an experienced law firm in your corner. The attorneys at MJA have decades of experience and have defended service members charged with some of the most serious offenses under the UCMJ. Contact one of our military defense lawyers today to learn more.

    What is Considered Obscene under Article 120a, UCMJ?

    To be guilty of violating Article 120a, UCMJ, the Government must prove three elements:

    1. That the accused deposited or caused to be deposited in the mails certain matter for mailing and delivery;
    1. That the act was done wrongfully and knowingly; and
    1. That the matter was obscene.

    Let’s break down the important definitions from those elements.

    The most important definition to understand is the meaning of “obscene” material. Courts define “obscene” as that “form of immorality relating to sexual impurity which is grossly vulgar, obscene, and repugnant to common propriety, and tends to excite sexual desire or deprave morals with respect to sexual relations. Article 120a explains that whether something is obscene is a question of fact for the judge or jury to decide.

    In addition to being of a sexually impure and deviant nature, the matter must violate community standards of decency or obscenity and must go beyond customary limits of expression. The community standards of decency or obscenity are to be judged according to a reasonable person in the military community as a whole, rather than the most prudish or the most tolerant members of the military community.

    Finally, to prove a violation of Article 120a the government must show that the person’s actions were knowing and wrongful. “Knowingly” simply means the person deposited the material with knowledge of its nature. In other words, if a person mailed a package and reasonably believed that the contents of the package did not contain any obscene material, that could be a defense at trial. Knowingly depositing obscene matter in the mails is “wrongful” if it is done without legal justification or authorization.

    Mailing Obscene Matter is a "Covered Offense"

    The offense of mailing obscene matter has become even more serious in recent years given that it is now considered a “covered offense” under the UCMJ and will be reviewed by the Office of Special Trial Counsel (OSTC). Established by the FY22 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the OSTC is composed of specially trained military prosecutors who handle only serious criminal offenses. The OSTC has the authority to prosecute the following “covered offenses”:

    • Article 117a, Wrongful Broadcast or Distribution of Intimate Visual Images
    • Article 118, Murder
    • Article 119, Manslaughter
    • Article 119a, Death or Injury of an Unborn Child
    • Article 120, Rape and Sexual Assault
    • Article 120a, Mail, Deposit of Obscene Matter
    • Article 120b, Rape and Sexual Assault of a Child
    • Article 120c, Other Sexual Misconduct
    • Article 125, Kidnapping
    • Article 128b, Domestic Violence
    • Article 130, Stalking
    • Article 132, Retaliation
    • Article 134, Child Pornography
    • A conspiracy, solicitation, or attempt to commit a covered offense is also a covered offense.

    The OSTC took effect on 27 December 2023 and now has jurisdiction with respect to covered offenses that occur after that date. When going up against the best prosecutors in the Department of Defense, service members facing court-martial need to have the very best legal defense representation.

    Maximum Punishment

    Mailing obscene materials is considered a Category 2 offense under the UCMJ that carries anywhere from 1-36 months of confinement, along with the possibility for a dishonorable discharge and total forfeitures of all pay and allowances.

    Protect Your Freedom and Your Military Future

    When your career, freedom, and future are on the line, you need an experienced law firm in your corner that will zealously fight for you. MJA has defended service members facing investigation, court-martial, and discipline for the most serious offenses under the UCMJ and will ensure that every avenue of defense is aggressively pursued on your behalf.

    Here are some of the advantages of choosing our firm:

    • Legal Expertise: When you hire us, you benefit from our extensive legal expertise and experience in military law. Our lawyers have in-depth knowledge of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and understand the complexities of military court-martial proceedings.
    • Strategic Guidance: We provide strategic guidance tailored to your specific case. Our lawyers assess the details of your situation, identify potential legal defenses, and develop a customized defense strategy aimed at achieving the best possible outcome.
    • Protecting Your Rights: As your legal representatives, we are dedicated to protecting your rights throughout the legal process. We ensure that you receive fair treatment and due process under military law, advocating on your behalf at every stage of the proceedings.
    • Navigating Complex Procedures: Military court-martials involve complex procedures and rules that can be difficult to navigate without legal assistance. We guide you through the entire process, from pre-trial investigations to courtroom proceedings, ensuring that you understand your rights and obligations every step of the way.
    • Evidence Gathering and Presentation: Our firm is skilled in gathering and presenting evidence to support your case effectively. We work diligently to uncover exculpatory evidence, challenge the prosecution's case, and present compelling arguments in your defense.
    • Negotiating Plea Deals: In some cases, negotiating a plea deal may be the most advantageous option for minimizing the potential consequences of a conviction. We have experience negotiating with military prosecutors to secure favorable plea agreements when appropriate.
    • Courtroom Representation: If your case goes to trial, our lawyers provide strong and effective courtroom representation. We are skilled litigators who advocate zealously for your interests, presenting your case persuasively to the court-martial panel or judge.
    • Minimizing Penalties: If you are convicted of a military offense, our goal is to minimize the penalties you face. We work tirelessly to secure leniency in sentencing and explore options for rehabilitation, mitigating the impact of the conviction on your military career and future prospects.
    • Emotional Support: Dealing with legal proceedings can be emotionally challenging, especially in cases involving serious allegations. We offer compassionate support and guidance throughout the process, helping you navigate the emotional aspects of your situation with empathy and understanding.
    • Peace of Mind: By hiring us as your legal representatives, you can have peace of mind knowing that you have a dedicated team of professionals fighting for your rights and working toward the best possible outcome in your case. We are committed to providing you with the highest level of representation and support during this difficult time.

    Contact MJA today for a free consultation. 

    Understanding Article 120a, UCMJ – Mails: deposit of obscene matter
  • On September 30, 2025, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth announced a series of new directives aimed at strengthening military readiness and supporting U.S. warfighters as they train to fight and decisively win our nation’s battles. The new directives include changes to how the military handles allegations of discrimination and harassment within its ranks.

    The recent changes were announced in a meeting with the nation’s most senior military officers during which Secretary Hegseth criticized “politically correct” policies that encouraged frivolous and anonymous complaints and placed service members in “legal limbo”, sidelining careers and detracting from mission accomplishment. Secretary of War Hegseth’s policies are sure to shake things up and provided greater protection against false and frivolous complaints.

    Overview of the Secretary’s Reform Plan

    On September 30, 2025, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth directed the Under Secretary of War for Personnel and Readiness (USW(P&R)) to “implement key reforms across the Department’s MEO and EEO programs to optimize organizational effectiveness, ensure readiness, and prevent abuse of process.” The directive was preceded by a comprehensive review of the Department of War’s MEO and EEO programs that occurred earlier this year.

    Under the new directive, the Secretaries of the Military Departments are required to make changes regarding the handling of MEO/EEO complaints, the impact such complaints have on service members, and how commands can deal with false or frivolous complaints. At a minimum, the reforms must ensure that:

    • Complaints are promptly (within 30 days) addressed and dismissed if they lack actionable, credible evidence;
    • Favorable personnel actions such as awards, promotions, and retirements, involving alleged offenders are only withheld where a preliminary or subsequent investigation indicates that the complaint is likely to be substantiated; and
    • Those who knowingly submit false complaints and repeatedly submit frivolous complaints are held accountable, pursuant to applicable laws and regulations.

    Military Equal Opportunity (MEO) Reforms

    While the MEO and EEO programs are important for preventing and responding to incidents of discrimination and harassment, there have long been concerns of the programs being weaponized to avoid accountability for poor performance or target unpopular leaders.

    To combat these concerns, the reforms will replace the current anonymous reporting system with a confidential complaint reporting option to MEO Professionals. The new program will also provide mediation as a “first-line alternative” to filing a formal MEO Complaint. This is huge. Mediation will foster early conflict resolution and reduce the administrative burdens placed on service members and commands with lengthy investigations.

    Under the new reforms, MEO complaints that lack sufficient merit to trigger an investigation will be systematically dismissed, and unsubstantiated complaints will be closed within 7 business days. To reinforce the integrity of the MEO complaint process, commanders will retain the right to prosecute false complainants for a violation of Article 107, UCMJ.

    Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Reforms

    Secretary Hegseth’s directive also implements a number of changes to the EEO program. This includes:

    • Centralizing EEO Program Organization and Operations to ensure consistent application and timely resolution of complaints;
    • Expediting Senior Official EEO Cases to avoid the indefinite suspension of careers for allegations affecting general/flag officers and senior executives;
    • Centralizing EEO Investigations to increase oversight and standardize policy implementation;
    • Dismissing EEO Complaints when the complainant fails to provide relevant information or documentation upon request; and
    • Establishing Compliance Measures to Track EEO Reform Actions.

    Defending Against MEO and EEO Complaints

    While these changes are certainly a huge step in the right direction, the new reforms are not a guarantee to prevent false or frivolous MEO and EEO complaints.

    Service members facing a complaint must understand that the decisions they make while under investigation—and what they choose to say or not say—will directly impact their likelihood for success. Here are three fundamental rights you can, and should, invoke:

    Right to counsel. Service members suspected of violating the UCMJ, which includes alleged violations of military MEO and EEO policies, have the absolute right to consult with an attorney, military or civilian, before waiving their rights. It is crucial to consult with an attorney if you are suspected of an offense. Remember that no matter the specific legal circumstances you are facing, you are entitled to legal counsel and should utilize it.

    Based on the circumstances of your case, an attorney may be able to identify a defense to the allegations. Some of the most common defenses include:

    • False accusations or accusations with ulterior motives;
    • Lack of evidence;
    • Reasonable mistake of fact;
    • Failure of due process;
    • Alibi;
    • Entrapment or coercion;
    • Expired statute of limitations for prosecution; or
    • Mistaken identity.

    Right to remain silent. Service members have an absolute right to remain silent if questioned about a suspected UCMJ violation. Providing a statement to law enforcement almost never helps and may result in additional charges. If the statement you make is different from that of the alleged victim, you may be charged with making a false official statement or obstructing justice. “Cooperating” with law enforcement won’t prevent the military from taking adverse action against you–it just makes the government’s case stronger.

    Right to refuse consent. There is also no obligation to consent to any search or seizure of your person or property. If investigators have probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime in a certain location, they must obtain an authorization from your commander before conducting a search. Absent probable cause, the only way law enforcement can search or seize your property is with your consent. Providing consent gives law enforcement the right to search your phone, vehicle, residence, or person for evidence which they intend to use against you. Don’t be fooled.

    Protect Your Freedom and Your Military Future

    When your military career, future, and freedom are on the line, you need an experienced law firm in your corner. The attorneys at MJA have decades of experience and have defended service members charged with some of the most serious offenses under the UCMJ, including allegations of discrimination and harassment. Contact one of our military defense lawyers today to learn more.

    Secretary of War Orders Reforms to MEO and EEO Complaint Processes